در این مقاله که در دسامبر 2014 در مجله "فلسفه و نقد اجتماعی" (Philosophy and Social Criticism) منتشر شده
است و اساس آن بخش مهمی از پایان نامه دکتری من است، من کوشیده ام قرائتی از
لیبرالیسم سیاسی جان رالز و مفاهیم اصلی آن همچون موازنه تاملی، اجماع
همپوشان و خرد عمومی ارائه کنم که قابل انطباق بر کشورهای اکثریت مسلمانی
است که آنها را پسااسلامگرا خوانده ام و به نظرم مصداق مهمش ایران است. این مقاله بخشی از پروژه بزرگتری در مورد رالز و
ایران است. مقاله از صفحه من در سایت آکادمیا از اینجا قابل دانلود است. خلاصه مقاله از قرار زیر است:
Abstract: This
article tries to develop a moderate reading of political liberalism
applicable to post-Islamist, Muslim-majority societies.
Contrary to the strong reading, which considers
political liberalism as limited in its scope to those societies that
already
have a strong liberal tradition, I argue that
Rawls’ project does have something to offer to reasonable post-Islamist,
Muslim
individuals. In part I of the article the idea of a
post-Islamist, Muslim-majority society is conceptualized and explained.
Part II focuses on the Rawlsian ideas of
justification, demonstrating that the conceptions of justification
available in political
liberalism, i.e. political constructivism, wide
reflective equilibrium and a wide view of public reasoning with its
ideas
of declaration and conjecture, can justify the
political conception of justice for reasonable individuals living in any
society,
including post-Islamist ones. Focusing on Rawls’
notions of stability in part III, I argue that the idea of overlapping
consensus
should not be considered as the only account of
stability offered by political liberalism. Put another way,
notwithstanding
the strong reading of political liberalism in real
western and post-Islamist democracies, liberal stability is always a
mixture
of overlapping consensus and modus vivendi.
Keywords: John Rawls, Political Liberalism, Post Islamist/Muslim Majority Societies, Moderate Reading, Reasonableness
هیچ نظری موجود نیست:
ارسال یک نظر